{"id":2127,"date":"2009-03-15T10:02:50","date_gmt":"2009-03-15T14:02:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/?p=2127"},"modified":"2020-11-28T18:14:51","modified_gmt":"2020-11-28T23:14:51","slug":"charity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/2009\/03\/15\/charity\/","title":{"rendered":"Charity"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>I asked friends to share their strategies and targets for charitable giving. In the spirit of \u201cshow me yours \u2026\u201d here\u2019s our current plan:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We\u2019ve got a budget that works pretty well these days. It took about 3 years of effort to get good at home budgeting \u2013 and it turns out that you don\u2019t need too much cool software at all. You just need a way to track expenses by major category (auto:fuel, groceries, books, dining out, etc) and the discipline to reconcile it every month. With a few months of real data in hand, it\u2019s possible to see where your money is going and to make changes \u2013 a little at a time \u2013 in a couple of categories at a time. We used to be really bad at this \u2013 we got better with practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Within that budget, there\u2019s space for charity. We\u2019re shooting for \u201c10% of the monthly paycheck\u201d, but we\u2019re not there yet. As <a href=\"http:\/\/atgatg.livejournal.com\/\">atgatg<\/a> put it, 10% feels like a substantial, yet achievable and sustainable fraction. We certainly won\u2019t be 10% less happy if we put 10% of our cash into making positive change in the world rather than (for example) eating more sushi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So anyway, I\u2019ve got a system where I know my monthly budget for charity. This means that I can write checks with impunity. That might seem trivial, but knowing how much I\u2019ve got to spend \u2013 and that it\u2019s not coming out of anything else (i.e: yes, we can still go to the movies even though we gave $100 to whoever) is a huge psychological advantage. I don\u2019t have to go to <a href=\"http:\/\/redmed.livejournal.com\/\">redmed<\/a> and have a new conversation every month about how much we can afford. Instead we can skip right to \u201cwho gets it this month?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Within that, we looked for a split between major ongoing support for a few organizations and minor support for lots of them. Not knowing any better, we just split it 50\/50 between major and minor. Every month, 50% of the budget goes to the group(s) who are getting \u2018long term\u2019 support. Our major target at the moment is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.familyhm.org\/\">Family Health Ministries<\/a>. They\u2019re the ones with whom we go to Haiti, and I trust them completely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The other 50% is up for grabs on a monthly basis. I\u2019ve got a stack of potential charities pinned to my corkboard. When I get a request for money, or when a new charity comes to my attention, they go on the stack. When I do the bills at the beginning of the month, I pick up that stack and go through it with <a href=\"http:\/\/redmed.livejournal.com\/\">redmed<\/a>. We sort it and then write checks for what seem like reasonable amounts (relative to the group) until we\u2019re out of money for the month. Sometimes it\u2019s a single check to the top of the stack, sometimes groups want a couple bucks here and couple of bucks there and we get to support several of them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If a group doesn\u2019t make anywhere near the top of the stack for a long time \u2013 I usually discard them. No hard feelings \u2013 just keeps the stack manageable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If something urgent comes up (\u201chey! My kid is walking 10k for charity, can you help out?\u201d) we\u2019re flexible enough to put a bit of next month\u2019s money into it, and I\u2019ve got a way to be sure that I don\u2019t spend the money twice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Beyond looking for \u201cbalance,\u201d I don\u2019t have a specific system to manage:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>* Personal interest (old college clubs, etc)<br>* Local vs. global<br>* Targeted (this one classroom) vs. general (women\u2019s education worldwide)<br>* Even semi-selfish (NPR) vs. totally altruistic (stoves for Darfur)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Anyway, that\u2019s what we do.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I asked friends to share their strategies and targets for charitable giving. In the spirit of \u201cshow me yours \u2026\u201d here\u2019s our current plan: We\u2019ve got a budget that works pretty well these days. It took about 3 years of effort to get good at&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[70,71,60,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-charity","category-finance","category-philosophy","category-real-life"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2127"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2127\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2128,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2127\/revisions\/2128"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}