{"id":2081,"date":"2009-05-05T23:36:37","date_gmt":"2009-05-06T03:36:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/?p=2081"},"modified":"2020-11-27T16:55:08","modified_gmt":"2020-11-27T21:55:08","slug":"atheist-scholarship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/2009\/05\/05\/atheist-scholarship\/","title":{"rendered":"Atheist Scholarship"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>We judged the RI Atheist Society essays and picked a winner. I thought that the right thing to do was to write to all the non-winners personally. One guy wrote back, and I responded to him. I think it\u2019s a good conversation, so I\u2019ll share it here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>His question, for me, cuts to the quick of the matter: I consider religious diversity more than a matter of unhappy toleration while we wait for old people to die. I don\u2019t insist that everyone agree with me, merely that we set up our society in a way that we can all live together happily.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Modern atheism is going severely off track when it insists that everyone agree with it. That\u2019s not how the world works. There is one gravitational constant, and one speed of light. There are many ways to live a good and happy life. There are a lot of different sorts of people in the world \u2013 and for some of them religion is the best path.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><code>K,<\/code><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I\u2019m writing to notify you of the results of the RI Atheist Society essay<br>contest and scholarship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While you are certainly a strong student and a talented writer, we did not<br>select your essay for the scholarship this year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Your emphasis on the balance between individual rights necessary in society<br>touches on what I consider the heart of the issue: Living in a free and<br>democratic society requires a balance, and my opinion is that we must err on the<br>side of personal freedom. Your comments about the freedom to express one\u2019s<br>faith are well taken. This is a critical point that is all too frequently<br>neglected \u2026 we are free from the imposition of religion, not its existence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We intend to offer the scholarship in an expanded form next year. I encourage<br>you to apply again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Sincerely,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><code>C<\/code><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This evening I got a response from K, which says:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><code>Mr. C,<\/code><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thank you for taking the time to read my essay. With such a personalized response I think it would be foolish not to apply again next year. I appreciate that you actually took my essay into consideration and actually took the time to respond to my own specific essay which is certainly a first in the dozens of essay contests I have applied for and made me feel good knowing that my essay was not simply a chore for a scholarship committee to glance at.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I just have a couple of questions that I would like to ask if you would be so kind to answer. First off, I was wondering if being atheist is a prerequisite to applying for the scholarship. I think based on my essay you have noticed that I am not one but that I agree that there should be a seperation of church and state. Secondly, I was wondering if future essays will be open-ended as this year\u2019s was, meaning that the essay topic could be agreed upon regardless of the applicant\u2019s religion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Thanks again,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><code>K<\/code><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I was feeling talkative, so I said this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><code>K,<\/code><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Maybe it\u2019s because I\u2019m new to this scholarship \/ essay thing, but I figured it was only polite to read all of the submissions. Perhaps over time I\u2019ll become jaded and just glance them over looking for something I agree with \u2013 but I hope not. It was a hard decision. Given the effort I know all the applicants put in, I felt that a personal response was the least I could do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Your question came up a couple of times as we were setting this up. My clear and forceful answer is that there is absolutely no requirement that you be an atheist in order to receive our scholarship. If we were looking for a deserving atheist, we would have said that up front. Frankly, I rejected a couple of essays out of hand because they were too cloyingly sycophantic. I didn\u2019t ask for 1,000 words on how cool the RI atheist society is \u2013 I asked about the separation of church and state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One of my professors in school told me that the hallmark of a good ethical question is that you won\u2019t be able to resolve it to everyone\u2019s satisfaction. If it\u2019s that simple, it\u2019s probably not ethics. My dream is that if I do this for a few years, I\u2019ll eventually be convinced enough by one of the applicants to change my opinion about something. That essay would win in an heartbeat. Your essay and this conversation give me hope that I\u2019m on the right track.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I know that I\u2019m an odd duck in modern atheism \u2026 but I think that the world\u2019s major spiritual traditions have tremendous value insofar as they provide comfort and strength to billions of people. So long as we can build good fences and good laws \u2026 and learn to live without killing each other \u2026 I\u2019m a big fan of religious diversity in the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Perhaps I\u2019m just a \u201cnon\u201d theist rather than an \u201ca\u201d theist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In any event: Keep up the good work, and I hope to hear from you next year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><code>-C<\/code><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We judged the RI Atheist Society essays and picked a winner. I thought that the right thing to do was to write to all the non-winners personally. One guy wrote back, and I responded to him. I think it\u2019s a good conversation, so I\u2019ll share&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[67],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2081","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-atheism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2081","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2081"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2081\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2082,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2081\/revisions\/2082"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2081"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2081"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwan.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2081"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}